I Too was Tortured by the British Government For My Black Race & Religion.

Marcia Kia Simpson-James.

The Iron Maiden of Torture - Victim disappeared and hidden in this box.

I am one of the few surviving Black "West-Indian" Torture victims of the British government.

The British government (The Queen, Prince Philip, Prince Charles; former Foreign Secretary & racist jew David Miliband; Speaker of the House - Michael Martin, Head of Security 'Mr Cummings'; Inspector Tucker - Parliamentary police officer, Eliza Manningham-Buller former head (director general) of MI5; John Prescott (former deputy prime minister; Dominic Grieve - now UK government's Attorney general; Nick Clegg-deputy prime minister; David Cameron-present British prime minister; Gordon Brown -then chancellor of rhe Exchequer, former prime minister; Peter Mandelson; Tony Blair; Keith Hill - racist former Brixton MP given peerage to become Rachman-slum-landlord to Black tenants; Steve Reed - racist,sadistic homosexual, mentally disordered Leader of Lambeth Council;  Sir Gus O Donnell; Brian Paddick - former Lambeth borough council who oversaw the mass murders of Black people in police stations and on the street; Sir Ian Blair- former head of Met police; Sir Paul Stephenson-present head of Met police, Jonathan Evans-present head of MI5; Sir John Sawyer - present head of MI6; Peter Housden- former permanent secretary of Department for Communities and Local Government; Chuka Harrison MP - who directly and personally benefited from the attacks on me, Michael Fawcett & Patrick Harrison - Employee of prince Charles, Ann-marie Harrison -racist Lambeth social worker, Micheal   and persons unknown) endorsed my torture, arbitrary detention, disappearance, defamation and the genocide of the entire Black "West-Indian" and Rasta community.

Theresa May, present Home Secretary, is also illegally committing malfeasant crime in public office by upholding and supporting these actions by the active suppression of information about the secret 'dodgy' dossier on me, and other Black English people of "West-Indians" Jamaican descent. This with the aid of racist jewish members joint parliamentary committee for Human Rights - especially the racists Lord Lester and the ugliest woman in Britain, jew Baroness Stern.

Then there is the strange case of the missing man, Dr David James, of the Fixated Threat Assessment Centre. Dr Death witnessed me being assaulted, intimidated and subjected to a mock execution on the foyer of Portcullis House, parliament.

Oddly, the whole area was cleared of both parliamentary staff and the public, leaving me alone, in that area with a strangely wizzened old white man, I did not know that this was Dr David James of the Fixated Threat Assessment Centre, then, but know him to be so from his numerous television appearances. However, since I was subjected that particular mock execution, (there were two others that followed on at later dates), I have noted that he has changed his appearance.

It seems to me, that he has undergone plastic surgery, or some kind of augmentation that makes him appear to be much younger than when I saw him in the flesh.
Then, he appeared to be approximately 70-years old or older, tweed jacket, (perhaps leather patches on elbows), v-necked jumper, a strange light green shirt, dark cord trousers, brown brogue shoes. He dressed as most people would assume a "Professor"  from an Evelyn Waugh novel would dress. He was being supported by an Inspector Tucker, a Mr Cummings, and many armed territorial police. There was also another mysterious man, who claimed that he dealt with "Crown Property". He was a white man, dressed in a smart very dark blue jacket, with brass buttons, grey or lighter trouser. His hair was almost reddish, he had a almost ruddy complexion, he almost had an air of a low ranked military man, who had moved on to working in parliament.

I was faced by this group bearing down on me, whilst shouting instructions at  me to stop "writing your complaint" and leave.

Dr David James, sat some 20 yards away giving all the appearance of being a member of the public. He did not appear to have anything in his hands. However, on this group of gun-toting territorial police reaching the area of the foyer, (where I was sat quietly writing a complaint about being subjected to racism, intimidation, death threats, etc), I was circled by approximately 6-7 armed officers who circled me, pointing their guns to my temple.

All had expressions of hatred on their faces, and I was shouted at by several of these armed territorial police officers, who made it clear that I was not welcome. A young man, (I assume he worked in Portcullis House) attempted an intervention, by asking me if I had an appointment with such and such a man. I replied no. and the police continued to circle me. The young man looked terrified of the police, and looked at them with complete fear, contempt and horror. He reluctantly walked away from the scene, but constantly looked behind himself, as if he were afraid that the police may shoot him, or more likely me. It was as if he were expecting to witness a murder.

I kept extremely still.

I did not speak.

Then I was told that I should leave the building immediately, and if I had a 'complaint' I should "go next door to the police station".

I stood up, picked up my handbag, and stepped out of Portcullis House before these loose cannons shot me without provocation.

As I went through the revolving doors and onto the pavement, I turned to look back, and every single one of these territorial police officers, ran, and circled this Dr David James, they were all laughing, jumping up and down, holding their guns with the barrel facing upwards, and they were all estatic. It was as if this Dr David James was their hero!

I thought this was strange, since this man appeared to be a member of the public, he had not spoken to me, and I had not spoken to him.

As I made to step into the well of the revolving door, a big thick-necked fat, territorial policeman came rushing towards me from this celebrating group, and pointed this gun at me, and shouted "if you come back into this building I'll shoot you" he also mentioned a "secret dossier" on me. At that I withdrew.

 I stood watching through the glass window as this celebrating group, with Dr David James in the middle, moved towards the lifts. I was both appalled and shocked. I wondered who this broken-down, very old ,wizzened white man was?

Who was this mad man character, that appeared to have total charge of these police? There were all white.

All cases of my 'kettling' happened predominately in or at St. Stephen's entrance, or in the foyer areas of Portcullis House. It should also be noted that Baroness Ros Howells was a big part of this, as well as Lord Patel of Bradford, and "the head of the door-keepers", who although in his late forties, appeared to want to appear younger. In this man's case, Had a conversation with him about the 'anti-stalking-harassment' injunction I had in my handbag.

A young Black female, member of staff, asked to see it. She looked shocked at the contents of the documents, and was very upset with her colleagues. She advised me to "take it as far as it can go!"

I was also told by another member of parliament staff, that some Black staff were starting to complain about my treatment. Apparently some had even left their jobs in parliament in protest.

It was soon after the formation of this Fixated Threat Assessment Centre, that my home was raided and I was disappeared. Apparently arrest warrants were issued with wrong names, and details. Oddly, these warrants were so strong that special judges and magistrates had to be involved and the Director of Public Prosecutions had to be personally involved, updated, and in control of this case.

This on the back of a single Black 'Rasta' woman who lawfully attended parliament to listen to human rights debates, and issues that related to the Black "West-Indian" community. On the day of my being disappeared

Later I discovered that all this energy was being put into this strange case, which included attempted murder, was to prevent my running for any meaningful political post in Brixton or Lambeth.

I did not know it at the time, but the Establishment had had-picked a mixed-racist Irish-Jew-Muslim-Nigerian  for the role of new MP for the area.  This character, was Chuka Harrison, better known by his 'Nigerian-oil' name Chuka Umunna, grandchild and nephew of a racist jewish judge and barrister. Sir Helenus Patrick Joseph Milmo was involved in MI5 and the creation of 'enhanced' interrogation and torture techniques before and during the Nuremberg trials. 


Gerald Kaufman was recently chided for pointing out that parliament is full of extremist jews. He made a comment after the jews decided that they want to get rid of the Universal Jurisdiction laws which allows victms of torture to bring a private prosecution against a torturer.


Now they want the public to have to receive 'permission' and 'consent' personally from the Director of Public Prosecutions to bring a torture case against a torturer. See the recent warrant of arrest issued against Israel's foreign minister Tzipporah Malkah also know as  "Tzipi" Livni.


Do I need to say any more?


For the interest of the reader, just an after thought. Is it coincidence that those involved are connected via word association? For Example, I was born in Manningham, Bradford, I have a brother called Patrick and a sister called Ann-marie, I know a Joseph and Harrison is mixed-racist and a 'latent' 'mareno'  jew.

British Government's Mass Breach of Human Rights of the Unemployed who will be Coerced into Free Forced Labour & Slavery for Benefits

Marcia Kia Simpson-James.

Chris Grayling - The public perceive him to be pushing a DWP-fronted  'gangsters' policy.

Vicious British government minister for the Department for Work & Pensions (DWP- minister for unemployment) has recently introduced a draconian Order which forces qualified unemployed people into working for free for lobbying "employment" firms running government contracts.

The unemployed will now find that they will be forced into slave labour for no pay, or onto irrelevant "training" to 'update' their skills.

If unemployed graduates or former highly qualify 'refuse', they will have their benefits stopped for up to 1 year.

This could mean that many already pressurised unemployed people, will be evicted, and become homeless because because they will not be entitled to housing benefits or hardship payments.

Responsible minister, Chris Grayling, seems to ignore the fact that we are presently in a recessional down-turn, which which well-versed economists say, will not turn around until early 2013.

Mr Grayling, has also been reluctant to explain how these draconian laws, which violate the claimants human rights, is contradicted by his department handing out valuable contracts to "training" providers, which are valued at at least £400 million.

Prime minister, David Cameron, has also decided to hide the fact that each one of these "training & employment" companies will receive an additional £14,000 for each person they force into disadvantaged low-paid jobs.

That means, that the overall expenditure could be in the region of £4-10 billion. This is false economy and deception is hidden within the recent George Osbourne-fronted Budget.

Since 80% Black people live in the most disadvantaged areas in the UK, this policy can only be interpreted as institutionally racist in its aim.

Chris Grayling (3rd from right at the back)) minister for the unemployed & Communities Secretary Eric 'Humpt-Dumpty' Pickles ( hugely fat man at centre front )whoops it up at  luxury event whilst implementing new employment laws that grossly violate the Human Rights of the vulnerable unemployed. International Human Laws are openly breached by Grayling and Darra Singh, (racist asian Chief Executive of DWP).

Some government sources are now so concerned about the negative affect of this policy, that they are fearful that it may eventually lead to violent  protests and civil disobedience. They are also aware, that this policy may open the government up to litigation which may cost them hundreds of millions of pounds in compensation costs. The government may also be open to justified accusations of harassment, intimidation and even mental torture if health issues are exacerbated by the rolling out of this 'stalking' threatening intitiative.

The policy, known, as "Welfare to Work",  was created by sleaze-soaked war profiteer Tony Blair former "Welfare & Benefits" 'guru, Lord David Freud.

This racist determinist Jew, who was the author of a report on the subject, on behalf of the the conservatives and the coalition government, promotes abusing the public as a 'legitimate' way of pushing down unemployment figures.

The DWP is now one of the most feared government departments because it advances ideologies that will have a negative effect both at national and local levels.

There is a growing feeling of apprehension, that once the educated unemployed, graduates, and the unemployed 'squeezed middle-classes become aware of the reality that they will be asked to mop floors and stack super-market shelfs  'in exchange' for their benefits, there will be hell to pay in terms of votes.

The public have not failed to note, that Nick Clegg, leader of the Lib Dem's and deputy prime minister in the present Coalition govenment, is busily trying to push through voting changes (Alternative Voting) in a slimy bid to cancel the effect of this rough Justice "Welfare to Work" policy. I doubt that it will work. 

Before I go, it might be useful for the reader to note, that within all the disadvantaged areas where these private profit-driven "training" companies operate, instead of unemployment rate going down, there has been a marked increase in the numbers of unemployed. This would appear to be a contradiction in terms. In Brixton alone, there are at least 8 companies profiteering from the vulnerable unemployed. So let the games commence!

Chris Grayling - A useless non-enterprising  man.

See the discussion in HR article below:

http://www.hrmagazine.co.uk/hro/news/1019226/jobseekers-lose-benefits-refuse-free-training?utm_source=HR%20Magazine&utm_medium=adestra_email&utm_term=&utm_content=Jobseekers%20could%20lose%20their%20benefits%20if%20they%20refuse%20free%20training&utm_campaign=HR%20Magazi

Corrupted MEP's & MP's Make Illegal Laws, Influenced and Paid for by Lobbyists.

'Part-time' German MEP and 'full-time' Lawyer simultaneously profits from illegally sharing European parliamentary 'insider' information. Businessmen and industrialists pay big 'Cash-for-'advice & influence'.

This despicable practice, gives them access to the levers of power and money, which leads to large governmental contracts and massive advantage over all competitors.

See Reuters article below:

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/03/18/uk-europe-lobbying-idUKTRE72H21M20110318

Innocent Black Englishman Falsely Accused of Rape and Fraud by Criminally Psychotic White Woman

Mr Paul Joseph - ruined innocent  Stalking Victim.
His honour and reputation were  impugned  by his 'mad' female stalker.

Earlier this month - (written in October 2010), a disturbed white woman, was convicted of Stalking (harassment) as well as making false allegations against a Black Englishman, of rape, assault, fraud, theft and perverting of the course of justice at Guildford Crown Court. The presiding judge, Neil Stewart, has already warned the convicted woman, that she should prepare for a substantial custodial sentence.

Paul Joseph, the innocent 39-year-old former computer consultant, had his reputation and career ruined by his ex-girlfriend, 31-year-old, white woman, Kate Woodhead.

Kate Woodhead, a part-time property manager and 'horsewoman', had made the false claims, after Mr Joseph attempted to finish their unstable two year relationship after he became concerned about her strange and erratic behaviour.

The modest and well spoken, Mr Joseph, unbelievably initially found himself in the position, of being threatened with a long prison sentence, after Woodhead had secretly gone to the police 52 times to maliciously report him for numerous crimes. Fortunately, Mr Joseph has never been charged with any offence.

However, Mr Joseph, who then earned £200,000 (approx $315,000), lost his job and most of his possessions - including his home; luxury cars; a super-charged motorbike; Rolex watches; a collection of expensive paintings and money, after the police went to his workplace to arrest him in front of his boss and his colleagues.

Shockingly, the unsuspecting man, also later found out that Woodhead had falsely claimed that he had laced her sandwich with the drug Diazepam, (a strong tranquiliser and anti-depressant), before carrying out the alleged rape. This could have amounted to an allegation of attempted murder.

Woodhead, also added to Mr Joseph's distress, by claiming that he had been "turned on" during the alleged rape, whilst removing her jodhpurs (tight trousers worn for horse-riding). In reality, no such drugging or rape had ever occurred.

In court, the innocent Mr Joseph found himself having to defend his honour, integrity and reputation from a slew of untrue attacks and allegations made by the disgruntled Woodhead.

This case was found so scandalous, and the false defamatory allegations so damaging to Mr Joseph,that the judge has taken the unusual step of lifting the veil of anonymity from Woodhead, so that the press could publicly name and shame her as the psychotic criminal and pathological liar that she is.

Mr Joseph met Woodhead, whilst property hunting. He had arranged to view a house in Surrey, and had made an appointment with Woodhead, who was then working as a property agent. Mr Joseph, a modest man, had arrived at the property driving a simple £70,000 car and wearing a Rolex watch.

Mr Joseph, a divorced father of two, now realises, in retrospect, that Woodhead was a gold-digger and only into him because of the high value of his money and assets. He also noted that it was Woodhead who had pursued him and asked him out,(not the other way around).

Mr Joseph had hesitated for 8 months after first meeting Woodhead, before he started to formally date her in October 2007. He admitted that he was initially concerned about her after she had asked him on a first date to a shabby pub.

He said, 'I thought it a bit odd, that a professional woman would feel comfortable inviting a professional man on a first date to the local pub instead of a good restaurant'. He then went onto explain, 'I am not a flashy man, and so decided to ignore this warning sign and go along, she seemed a nice girl at the time'.

It was soon after this, that Woodhead, invited Mr Joseph to move in with her in a £4,000-a-month rented property, in Wisley, Surrey. Woodhead, who appeared to have an idyllic life-style, claimed to own 5 horses, which she accommodated in stables on 6 acres of land which bordered onto a river.

Things started to become tense between the two, when Woodhead suddenly gave up her job as a property manager, and told Mr Joseph that she wanted to set up a riding school so that she could develop her own polo team.

The strain increased further, when Woodhead sprung it on Mr Joseph, that he should take full responsibility for the £4,000-a-month rent, as well as cover all the bills associated with the house, the horses and the riding school. The original agreement had been that they should share the costs of the rent and the bills equally.

Despite his surprise, Mr Joseph reluctantly agreed to this arrangement. He explained that he felt pressured, when she told him, that she was seriously depressed because she was under strain from trying to set up her polo team.

What Paul Joseph did not know, was that most people who own, buy, run and maintain polo horses are multi-millionaires, or hedge-fund company managers, who might form a consortium to share the cost of a very expensive 'hobby'. Therefore, Mr Joseph had unwittingly been put in an untenable financial position by his fantascist girlfriend.

What Woodhead failed to tell her boyfriend was that the costs associated with running riding schools and polo teams were so prohibitive, that not even the aristocracy, much less royalty, were willing to take on these financial burdens any more.

He said, 'When I told her that I could not afford to set up her riding school because I had the responsibility of my children, their school fees... plus the rent, she went mad...she ran outside, started to scream and shout and throw herself into a muddy puddle. I was shocked at her behaviour'.

According to Mr Joseph, Woodhead bellowed, "Look what you have done to me!" five or six times.

By this time reality had began to kick in, and Mr Joseph wanted out. But he was caught between a rock and a hard place. The 18-month lease was now in his name, (because Woodhead did not hava an income)and she had dung her heels in and had refused to leave the property when asked.

The relationship was finally over in April 2009, and Mr Joseph spent some time in a hotel, before returning to his rented property to discuss how the break-up would work in practical terms. He was horrified to find, on his return, Woodhead dressed in some flimsy outfit, in preparation of begging him to return to the relationship. He refused.

It was after his refusal to continue the relationship at this show-down, that Woodhead went to the police to make her allegation of rape. She was interviewed by worried police officers, who thought that they had a rapist in the mist of the village.

In court, the police said they had made a 'detailed video interview' with Woodhead on the rape. A senior officer, explained that he was surprised that Woodhead wanted to keep her visit to the police station secret, and said that she did not want Mr Joseph spoken to or arrested.

She went further, and swore the police to secrecy until she had "sorted out her business". This 'business' included the disposal of the house, Mr Joseph's Porsche cars, his designer suits, and his art collection.

The senior officer admitted, "we wanted to get this man, we thought he was a rapist, we wanted him off the streets of our village as soon as possible. We thought that he had threatened her into submission or something. But we respect the victim, and so decided to wait for her permission".

In a bizarre twist, Woodhead calmly returned to the joint home straight from the police station on 10th April 2009, later making love to Mr Joseph that same night.

It was only after the couple struggled on for a further two weeks in the same house, that things really came to a head.

It was on the 28th April 2009, that Mr Joseph unwittingly came across an even more sinister and seedy side to Woodhead. He told Guildford Crown Court that he had discovered "sordid pictures" of Woodhead from a sex website, alongside filthy 'sex messages' from other men. Mr Joseph went on to tell the court of his disgust at seeing the pictures and the text messages.

He said that he could only come to one conclusion, and that was that she was either a prostitute or an expensive sex escort girl. He explained that he wanted Woodhead to explain what she was doing taking pictures where she was practically naked.

Instead of an explanation, Woodhead ranted a raved, threatened Mr Joseph, and then stole two of his work laptops, his car keys and his mobile phones. Went he asked her to return his property, she refused. It was at this point that Mr Joseph called the police.

The police came, and removed Woodhead from the property. She, left the house shouting and swearing revenge, whilst still keeping hold of Mr Joseph's house keys, work laptops, and brief-case.

But Mr Joseph was not clear of his problem yet. The next day, she broke into the house, and arranged to have the locks changed whilst Mr Joseph was out at work.

He only discovered what Woodhead was up to, after he had returned home early from work, after he had been sacked for losing the laptop of a very important client.

Mr Joseph found himself in the surreal situation of having to explain to the locksmith who had been brought in by woodhead, that he was the leaseholder and had the documents to prove it.

Woodhead's friends have been shocked by their former friends behaviour. They decided to cut her off when she dragged them into her web of lies against Mr Joseph, who they trusted and respected for his fantastic treatment of Woodhead and his strong work ethic.

They found themselves unifying behind Paul, when Woodhead falsely claimed that he was attacking her at their home, when, in fact, the couple had been having dinner, at a popular restaurant with them. Some of Woodhead's friends gave police statements, which confirmed that Mr Joseph was a decent and innocent man.

Unfortunately, is still suffering from the fall-out of his stalkers harrowing works. He is now looking for another job, and is still trying to clear up the financial mess caused, by his giving Woodhead effective control over his bank accounts, (which she emptied). He has recovered some of his property, but has had to instigate legal actions, to recover his stolen property from some of Woodheads accomplices.

Unfortunately, it may come as small comfort to Mr Joseph, that the disturbed the Stalker, Kate Woodhead was sent to prison for three years.

Chillingly, before she was sent to prison, Kate the stalker declared that she had no remorse, and would "do it again" if she had the chance.

Brixton - The Manor-House in Lambeth of The One Who Serves - The Stamping Ground of the Black Prince.

Egyptus St Maurice The Great "Praeceptor Germaniae" & his Legendary pure Black Nobility. 

Edward the Black Prince was a 'quatre-caste' with some Black blood from one of St Maurice's Soldiers (legion mercenaries). This means that the pure Nazarene Black Blood of St Mary, St Maurice, Jesus and St Joseph went elsewhere.

Seals of  Stephen the Keeper of the Lion's Gate of  Black Wisdom.

UKTI Sleaze-Sodden Prince Andrew Confesses he Loves to Work for Perverted Sex-Crazed Gun-Running Arab. Muslim Criminal 'Buys' Prince's Young Daughter Beatrice For 'Cheap' Price £16,000 Diamond necklace

Prince Andrew, also known by his nickname "Randy Andy", was yesterday advised by Buckingham Palace to keep a low profile.

I assume it is because the public have now learnt of yet another horrendous 'Randy Andy' faux pas. We now learn that Prince Andrew, the UK's 'Special' Trade envoy, has been happily working for a well-known gun-running criminal.

It turns out, that a muslim criminal called Kaitnui, 'bought' the young princess Beatrice (Andrew's daughter with former wife, the Duchess of York) for the price of a £16,000 diamond necklace.

Mothers' up and down the country, are still shivering at the notion of the Prince exposing his two young daughters to the billionaire convicted child-rapist monster and Paedophile Jeffrey Epstein . Now we find that the prince has exposed his children to yet another sick and perverted sexual-deviant all for the sake of a relatively 'cheap' diamond necklace. Child-abusing Arab gun-runner Kaitnui, got two for the price of one, when he gave the diamond necklace to Prince Beatrice.

Incredibly, at or around the same time Princess Andrew 'sold' his daughter, he then began to  lobby parliament, various government ministers and companies on behalf of his latest sickening sex-brute friend.





Tarek Kaituni, is the nephew of mad Libyan tyrant, col. Ghadaffi, and cousin of Ghadaffi's drug-fueled idiot son, Saif. As you will remember, Saif, bought his "Human Rights and Civil Society" PhD from the London School of Economics (LSE) for £1.5 million in the 2000's.

Consequently, the head of the university, a Mr Howard, resigned after it was discovered that Saif Ghadaffi  , and by extension, Libya had bought access and influence at the highest levels of British society, through paying bribes (bungs) and handing out gifts. Saif and his convicted drug-baron  cousin, Tarek Kaituni are so close, that Saif attended and even "blessed" Kaituni's wedding to a model in Istanbul, Turkey.

It may be that the criminal Arab influence was so great, that even the shape of Europe and the less than thorough risk assessment done on Turkey's acceptance into the European Union, was influenced by Ghadaffi   and Libya. Clearly there were many many people within the EU and British beaurocracy who either promised or given gifts and money on the understanding, that certain contracts be handed out, Europe 'accept' Arab Turkey into Europe unchallenged, and the cherry on the cake, was for the Arabs to literally "own" the royal family.

Hence the enthusiasm of Princes Charles, Andrew and even Philip.

This network of crime even flowed to Brixton, where the recently illegally elected MP for Streatham, half-caste, mixed-racist homo-bi-sexual Irish-freak-Nigerian-Jew, Chuka Harrison, was selected on the basis of his "Nigerian" (oil) connections. Thus a blanket campaign of  aggression and genocide was carried out against the British Black "West-Indian" community of Brixton. All for oil, and all for the royal families "Nigerian Muslim" friends. Thus completing the circle.

Libyan money even made it up here to Brixton, through various small-islanders, (agent provocateurs) who were paid to infiltrate the Rasta movement and Temple in Kennington. Thus labelling all Rastas as junkie, drug-sellers.

The Libyans and royal family like drugs such as Cocaine and 'Skunk'. I have personally seen Libyan's paying small-island Black men to masquarade as Rastas, and to work as police informers for Scotland Yard and  Lambeth police.

It is well known that the police turn a blind eye to many very senior and important men,(such as the most senior civil servants in the Cabinet Office) who, protected by the police, freely prowl the streets come to the Brixton and Lambeth looking to rape and assault very young boys (if they are homosexuals), or attack and rape very young girls (if they are pedasts).

The most senior political or diplomatic Arabs share the same perversions as their white male counterparts. Hence Saif being given an MI5/MI6 body-guard, and the new head of MI6 going to dead, homosexual, cross-dressing spy's, Gareth's funeral.  The catamite Gareth was lover to himself a  former catamite, Sir John Sawyer. Therefore Sir John was saying 'good-night' to his 'toy-boy'. And so we close the loop again. Squaring  the circle and drawing the plumb-line.

Ghadaffi's, Libya's and the influence of the Arabs and Jews is both shocking and appalling. The public would be shocked at how high this thing goes. for example  Foreign Secretary, William Hague's catamite had to be banished. His wife divorced him because of his homosexuality, and perceived drug use (homosexuals are notorious junkies). Once these people join the diplomatic service or the civil service, they are expected to perform and condone many stomach-turning, perverse sexual acts. These include homosexuality, beastiality, paedophilia, and necrophilia. These 'ailments are a most interesting collection of serious mental disorders.

These  serious mental disorders are 'carried' mainly by the men, (although there are some women carriers) usually passed through the mother's genetic weakness, but the fathers' practice. And hence we see parts expressed as determinism and dictatorship.

Tarek Kaituni with one of his young "girl" friends.

Domination is 'normal'  for these types. Real ordinary people, will never appreciate this sick mind-set, and so the likes of princes Charles, Andrew, Philip, Ghadaffis senior & junior, etc are drawn towards 'themselves'. Pathologically paranoid, fixated and obsessed machismo-driven sadists.

This is oddly, why, prince Andrew 'sold' princess Beatrice, and will never change his modus operandi.This is the reason, prince Andrew, et al will always be sleaze-balls, and will always move with sleaze-sodden types. The adage, 'birds of a feather flog together' is apt here. And so prince Andrew, must NOT be given the choice as to whether he leaves as UKTI ambassador or not. He must literally be removed from post, and monitored forthwith for his odd activities and proclivities. The same applies to prince Charles and Camilla (who is an especial manipulater and danger to far 'younger' women).

In fact, it would be wise to prepare for the end of the royal family, and the monarchy. These people are not only mad, but they are stupid with it. Once the public is up against that deadly combination, there is no other choice. It becomes about the survival of humanity. Hence, I recommend getting rid of the mentally sick 'Randy Andy', prince Charles and Camilla. William is the same, and the brother is even worst. There is no hope for them.

So the women of Britain have voted with their feet. No more Saif Ghadaffi, no more Jeffrey Epstein, no more Tarek Kaituni, etc. No more Paedophilia, animal abuse, medical experimentation on the public, crimes of aggression, extra-judicial killings (murder) and genocide - all these get our thumbs down. The People are no longer prepared to have their money abused by these rich or royal gang-leaders, who casually spread, purvey and promote sleaze and corruption. Thank God, the public has said - please, no more!

EU 2011 Prize for Contemporary ARChitecture - Where are the Black English-born "West-Indian" Architects and Projects?

Marcia Kia Simpson-James.

Below, we see yet another Architectural competition. Very good!

But where are the Black English-born "West-Indians" of African-descent? I am becoming more and more angry to see that after the Brixton Riots of 1981, there are no Black English Architects of note that I am aware of.

And yes, I am familiar with the usual Black suspects on the field. What is the problem? Why is there such a level of resistance against "West-Indians",  from white racist architects within universities and architectural firms. I've said it before and I'll say it again. This is a matter that requires a harsh approach. Tough love if you will.

Apparently, these white racist architects find it hard to "speak to" Black people. Yes, to "speak to" Black people! Universities. Doreen Lawrence, et al, are clueless about the subject and the minds of these elite professionals. Colonial white-colour dazzled Doreen Lawrence, can't seriously help me or any other sensible Black person. Colonials and slave-minded types, have been a hindrance to the entire Black race for years. I would estimate that these types have taken Black people back by 300 years. Enough is enough of these amateurs.

It takes Architect to know another. One either has it or one doesn't. And yes, it it elitist!

 Hopefully, by next year, I'll see a Black Architect or project being advanced by the European Union, otherwise, I might carry out my threat and either enter or become a judge myself.

See below for the 6 finalists for the EU prize for Contemporary Architecture. This prize's Foundation is based in Barcelona, Spain:

 Which scheme did you pick?

European Union Prize for Contemporary Architecture / Mies van der Rohe Awards

The European Union Prize for contemporary architecture and the Special Mention for an Emerging Architect are awarded every two years.The selection for the 2011 edition of the award is ongoing. The award ceremony will take place on 20 June at the Mies van der Rohe Pavilion in Barcelona, Spain.

Finalists of the 2011 Edition

The six finalists for this year's edition of the Prize announced by the European Commission together with the Mies van der Rohe Foundation are:

Neues Museum Berlin, Germany - David Chipperfield Architects / David Chipperfield (Photo by: Jörg von Bruchhausen)	Bronks Youth Theatre Brussels, Belgium MDMA – Martine De Maesenner Architecten / Martine De Maeseneer, Dirk Van den Brande (Photo by: Filip Dujardin)
MAXXI: Museum of XXI Century Arts Rome, Italy - Zaha Hadid Architects / Zaha Hadid, Patrick Schumacher, Gianluca Racana (Photo by: Iwan Baan)	Concert House Danish Radio Copenhagen, Denmark - Ateliers Jean Nouvel / Jean Nouvel (Photo by: Philippe Ruault)
Acropolis Museum Athens, Greece - Bernard Tschumi Architects / Bernard Tschumi (Photo by: Christian Richters)	Rehabilitation Centre Groot Klimmendaal Arnhem, The Netherlands - Architectenbureau Koen van Velsen / Koen van Velsen (Photo by: Rob´t Hart Fotografie)

About the Prize

The biennial European Union Prize for Contemporary Architecture and the Special Mention for an Emerging Architect are awarded to highlight recent, excellent examples of architectural creativity of works which are less than two years old and to underline that modern architecture is socially and culturally rooted in European cities and is important in people's everyday life. The prizes are awarded for works in the countries participating in the Culture Programme.

The Prize consists of 60 000 EUR and the Special Mention consists of 20 000 EUR.

Organization

The European Commission manages the European Union Prize for Contemporary Architecture in cooperation with the Mies van der Rohe Foundation. The Foundation is in charge of organising the selection and the award ceremony of the Prize. The Mies van der Rohe Foundation was selected in 2008 on the basis of an open call for proposals as part of the "Special action" of the Culture Programme.

The Mies van der Rohe Foundation is based in Barcelona and is supported by a network of 15 architecture institutes and a committee of experts from 31 countries. (Website of the Prize

Tony Blair's Honours-Selling Catholic Priest - Plants Young Seeds in the Minds of vulnerable.

Marcia Simpson-James.

• 
  
• Today we have discovered that racist former British prime minister, Tony Blair, is not the only one who has been corrupted by power. 
• 
  
• Unbelievably, Tony Blair's friend and personal Catholic priest, racist Irish Catholic, Father Micheal Seed was found to have sold Papal Knighthoods for £50,000 - £100,000 a shot.

  

  The New Maundy Gregory - Purveyor of Honours, Father Michael Seed. He has been banned from taking services since Pope has heard news.

Like Tony Blair, the alarm bells went off, when Father Seeds horrified congregation, discovered that he was asking for a minimum of £50,000 for the Knighthoods.

Sleaze-sodden Tony Blair, was publically chastised for selling Honours (e.g. "Big K's" - Knighthoods and "Big P's" - Peerages such as Lordships and Damehoods and seats in the House of Lords in Parliament) whilst in office.

Racist, anti-Black "West-Indians" - Irish, Asian, Scottish, Muslim and Sri Lankans were given Honors, after dealings (payments made to) racist Jewish "middle-men", who mediated & negotiated directly with Tony Blair.

The Africans, would use the more direct route, either going to directly to their 'asian' or 'muslim' masters or mistresses at  DFiD, the FCO, ODPM-DCLG or the Home  Office. Many meetings were held in rooms in Portcullis House and the old Parliament builidng itself, by the likes of Valerie Amos, Paul Boateng, John Prescott, etc under these strange circumstances.

Many of the civil servants involved were racist Irish or Scottish people.

Now Tony Blair is out of public office, he seems to have 'spread the love' of corruption to his wife and his 'civilian' friends. Taking unnecessary gifts and presents, whilst handing out a peerage here and there did not seem to phase Tony at all.

In fact, his body language of the time boasted of his activities. 

Now we find that Tony and his friends are now 'officially' (Whoops!) become the New Maundy Gregory(ies).

Only this time, the racist purveyor (seller) of Honours, Tony Blair, has the world as his stage. The world is his oyster.

Maundy Gregory was an Irish-Scottish man who sold Honours  pre- and post-world war II. He, by co-incidence, also operated from offices, a few doors away from No.10 Downing Street, in Whitehall.

Maundy (whose father was a Catholic priest) had offices were practically opposite parliament, so he could conveniently cut across the road to parliament, to speak to the relevant government minister, parliamentary official or MP. Like Tony, Maundy was not shy in coming forward in selling and buying medals for desperados.

Like Prescott's wife, many women of businessmen, wanted their husbands to 'buy' a peerage, so that they could be called "My Lady". The owner of Boots the Chemist did so, as did owners of companies who manufactured guns, bullets ,bombs, boots and military uniforms and tanks for the army. 

I wonder what will be the reward to the white racist, Black-hating, Catholic Tony Blair, for 'enabling'  Father Michael Seed corruption? I wonder to what purpose Micheal Seed became Tony Blair's out-rider and cheer-leader?

 All I know, is Tony Blair is cheap corruption personified. No amount of 'Hail-Marying' it out, will cover this Sin. Father Seed, may have taken advantage of the desperate, weak and feeble-minded for filthy lucre. What makes his Sin even greater, is that he was prepared to degrade the already tainted image of the child-abusing organisation, known as the Catholic church, for the benefit of Tony Blair and persons unknown.

The public are now asking, what did Tony and Cherie Blair promise Father Michael Seed, that was so big he was quite prepared to lose his job? Did they offer him the Pope-ship? Did they offer him the chance to be the first Catholic 'priest' in the House of Lords? I bet They did? Nothing is impossible in this world. 

If they [Tony & Cherie] explained to Father Micheal Seed, that all he needed to do, was to 'organise' a cue of people prepared to buy honours.

It would also help, if his 'constituents' came from the third and charitable sectors. Hence, when it was time, he would have the weak, frail, blind, vulnerable, and child-like individuals prepared to 'vote' him into the House of Lords. Nice one Michael! 

The Catholic Church have just agreed to pay over $150 million to a group of Native  American Indians for child sex abuse. We have not yet forgotten the hundreds of thousands of child-sex abuse victims produced by the Catholic church. 

Neither have we forgotten the thousands of sadistic and  perverted priests within the Catholic church who have yet to be brought to book and thrown in jail.

I wouldn't be surprised if we heard something along those lines about 'Father' Seed. Many mothers, after reading about  Seed, that he should be sent away forever, and put in a cell for the public's protection. I must say, I agree whole-heartedly with the sentiment. This man, is a dangerous 'hombre'.

Queen Makes a Killing! Kill "Golly-Wogs" and "Exterminate" 'Rastamice' - Open Hunt Season for Purveyors of Anti-Black Race-Hate "Pet" Names and 'Kill-a-Black' Effigies

Culprit No.1 -  Idiot

Culprit No.2 - R.Com

Culprit No.3 - RastaVermin author - 

Michael "I-am-a-Slave-Epaminondas" De Souza

Why Black British-born "West-Indians" are de jure Stateless who want and require the Restoration of Our States.

A Righteous Peoples.

Black British-born "West-Indians" are de jure Stateless individuals. I say this because of our history and the appalling treatment that has been casually been meted out against us as a community, by whites, asians, muslims and jews. We have been denied all the rights and attributes of citizens.

This is emphasised by primae facie lack of interest in our economic, social, cultural, civil and legal outlook.

Even the Africans, who are supposed to be 'with' us, are against dealing with those of use who are The historical Diasporans, "the remnants of Israel", "true heart of Africa and Europe".

The scandal of being responsible, culpable and liable  for the biggest crime against humanity ever recorded in the history of the world. Must send a chill down the spines of the criminals. And thus, the reluctance to either discuss the matter or acknowledge the problems existence.

So, here we are, de facto a group of Stateless individuals who belong to one of the most precious lines. So, at last, we know where we stand as a status symbol.

This means that we have several choices. Do we stay or do we go? Where and what is OUR Natural "State"?

I assume that we are at the beginning of the road to Statehood and State-building. Wish us happiness and good luck!

Indian government and their agents murder most Whistle-Blowers, British government close behind.

Below is a moving article on retaliatory actions taken against Whistle-blower in India.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-12696470

The British government are close behind in their treatment of local political activists who make Freedom of Information requests. Many people can lose their homes, or be murdered, 'mugged' or even raped as punishment. These activities are not the exclusive realm of the third world.

Why does America & British governments not have a Global Anti-Black racism Review Act that Monitors global crimes committed against the descendants of Black Victims of the 'Middle-Passsage' Slave Trade?

Black African-Caribbean Diasporan Women - kidnapped and maltreated by whites and Africans during the worst crime against humanity - "The Black Holocaust" of the middle passage.

The British Black African Caribbean are curious as to why Jews are allowed to get away with the most egregious crimes against humanity, racism and genocide against the descendants of the victims of the biggest crime against humanity - namely - the 'Middle-Passage' Slave Trade.

Black English people who are The Diasporan's of ancient history. Have been abused and killed for millenia by whites, arabs and asians. And yet no-one bats an eye, when the matter is brought up.

In fact, whites, jews, and their 'middle-man' asian friends, actually become angry, aggressive and murderous at the very mention of this part of recorded history. Jews are keen to carry on about their pain, their 'holocaust' and their experiences of "anti-semitism".

However, they are loathe to discuss, the fact that many of them were directly involved in the slave trade, that brought Black people, at that time to the Caribbean and Latin America.

The US Senate and Congress, at every opportunity, when discussing 'race' or 'racism' deliberately and secretly exclude any mention of Black people, and concentrate on "Jews". In every part of their legislation on "anti-racism", every single piece, the wording makes it clear that Black people are not considered human, and the only group who could possibly be subjected to "racism" are the 'jews' (semites). 

How did this situation come to be?

Lets look at the British parliament, the same rules seem to apply hear. Anti-Black jews rule to the point that they are not shy in their public expressions of their anti-Black racism. Their confidence is boosted by 'religious' references to their 'bible'. And yet their confidence is pricked on the very mention of Black people receiving any "Human Rights". In fact, the jew and the semite, will do everything in their power to kill, eliminate, destroy, remove and dispose of Black people of African-Caribbean Diasporan descent, and victims of the slavery process.

They load up parliament with their racist, anti-Black personnel, and make it their duty to 'crowd out' and intimidate Black people from the universities and libraries. Ask anyone who has witnessed or experienced jewish or semitic anti-Black African-Caribbean racism, and it will make for very interesting and horrifying listening.

Recently, the anti-Black jews, even went as far, as to usurp the 'Black slavery' issue, by installing their 'academics' into the institutions apparently set up to study and encourage Black Diasporan people to research their own history of  'the Slavery of Black people during the middle passage'. Low and behold, all the funding went to jews, and all the 'researchers' were white and jews.

Then they have the cheek to complain about "anti-semiticism in public discourse". These white jewish researchers, politicians and press associates, are busy defaming and smearing Black people day and night. 

The Black African-Caribbean man, woman and child, (descendants of the kidnapped slaves of the Caribbean) are then put in a position of being an open visible target for every racist extremist sadistic jew, semite, homosexual, transsexual,  paedophile, arab, asian and African in Europe and America.

And yet, the racist jew and his helpers, pretend they have nothing to do with the dire circumstances that Black African-Caribbeans (Black English) and African-Americans find themselves in. 

On top of that, they use their sinister connections to create an image of Black people as "aggressive", "dangerous", "violent" and "harmful to the public". And yet Black people are supposed to sit by quietly and accept our lot. They must be sick!

Looking at primary and secondary sources, it is clear that the jews, etc, were directly involved in the sponsoring, funding, etc of non-contemporary slavery. This is a given fact. And yet there is no Global Black non-contemporary Slavery denial Act to be seen. Why? Why are these jews determined to defame anyone who wants to have an honest discussion on the history of Black slavery, or the history of racism that has been expressed against Black people of African descent?

There is no need for an answer, the question is partially rhetorical. The world knows the answer. The jews are so racist and discriminatory, that they even have people imprisoned if they "query" any historical matter that relates to them. 

And then they complain when the public complain. What an outrage!

Enough is enough. There now needs to be global legislation that actively protects the public from racist jews and semites. If they are found to have abused the law to fabricate false charges against innocent people, they ought to be sent to prison for a long time.

Their intimidation of the public must stop, and must stop now. Otherwise, the time will come, when legislation will be worked upon which will move against their "intellectual", "judicial", physical and psychological intimidation, harassment and threats that cause alarm and distress.

If they claim they respect freedom of expression, let it be so. Otherwise, the judicial war starts to remove their placemen and women! No one is above the law, even if the law is loaded with your friends, cousins, freemason 'brothers' and 'sisters'!

Libyans are fighting for their liberty, it is time for the public in Europe to start fighting for theirs against this rampant jewish tyranny!